Free tools · Document search
Search the Gazettes and decisions
The full text of every Government Gazette and NERSA decision our figures come from, page by page. Type a phrase and go straight to the page that prints it, in our stored copy or at the source.
31 pages with the phrase Chief Albert Luthuli. Pages with all the words, in any order.
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… The Energy Regulator, having considered the Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality’s application, supporting information, and applicable legal framework, approves the tariff adjustments as …
Page 34 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… DETERMINATION OF Chief Albert Luthuli LOCAL MUNICIPALITY’S TARIFFS BASED ON THE COS STUDY 15 4.1. Revenue Requirement....................................................................................... 16 4.2. Cost Functionalisation …
Page 2 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… NERSA received Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality’s tariff application, accompanied by a revised Cost of Supply (COS) study, on 31 March 2026 for …
Page 7 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… The COS study submitted by Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality for the 2026/27 financial year tariff review is compliant with the NERSA-approved …
Page 23 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… DETERMINATION OF CHIEF ALBERT LUTHULI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY’S TARIFFS BASED ON THE COS STUDY a) The process that the Energy Regulator followed in considering …
Page 15 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… The Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality’s technical performance remains critically constrained by high energy losses, which, although improved at 31.28% (2024/25 …
Page 13 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… 19 Chief Albert Luthuli Tariff Application for the 2026/27 Financial Year 3
Page 3 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… 30 Chief Albert Luthuli Tariff Application for the 2026/27 Financial Year 4
Page 4 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… Regulation Act NERSA National Energy Regulator of South Africa OPEX Operating Expenditure Chief Albert Luthuli Tariff Application for the 2026/27 Financial Year 5
Page 5 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Chief Albert Luthuli, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9180
… At its meeting held on 6 May 2026, the Regulator Executive Committee (REC) considered Chief Albert Luthuli Local Municipality’s tariff application. Based on …
Page 1 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
Only official texts are here: Government Gazettes from the Government Printing Works and decisions of the National Energy Regulator (NERSA), which the Copyright Act (s12(8)(a)) leaves free of copyright. Each result names its publisher and links to the official copy. Our copy is the file we read the figures from, fingerprinted (sha256). Reports from the Department of Water and Sanitation aren’t here, as their terms don’t say they may be republished. The pages of NERSA decisions that list objectors and comments (455 pages) are left out, as they name people; in our copies of those decisions each such page is replaced by a page saying it is withheld, and the whole decision is on NERSA’s site. Pages printed as pictures are found only where we read them for a dataset. As data: /api/search/documents?q=.