Free tools · Document search
Search the Gazettes and decisions
The full text of every Government Gazette and NERSA decision our figures come from, page by page. Type a phrase and go straight to the page that prints it, in our stored copy or at the source.
14 pages with the word Mpofana.
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… NERSA received the Mpofana Local Municipality’s (Mpofana) tariff application together with its Cost of Supply (COS) study on 31 March 2026. The municipality …
Page 7 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… DETERMINATION OF MPOFANA’S TARIFFS BASED ON THE COS STUDY 4.1. The process followed in considering and approving Mpofana’s tariff application was …
Page 12 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… Basic Electricity IBT Inclining Block Tariff IPP Independent Power Producer MLM Mpofana Local Municipality MFMA Municipal Finance Management Act NERA National Electricity Regulation Act …
Page 6 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… CONCLUSION From a conspectus of the facts and evidence presented to the REC, it is appropriate to consider the review of Mpofana’s tariff …
Page 26 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… DETERMINATION OF MPOFANA’S TARIFFS BASED ON THE COS STUDY .................. 12 5. CONCLUSION ON THE COS STUDY .................................................................................. 21 6. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ..................................................................................................... 23 7. THE …
Page 3 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… At its meeting held on 11 May 2026, the Regulator Executive Committee (REC) considered Mpofana Municipality’s tariff application. Based on the facts and …
Page 1 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… In evaluating the financial and technical performance of Mpofana, the assessment relied on the D-forms for FY2024/25 submitted as part of the …
Page 11 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… In applying the ERA, NERSA is required to ensure that Mpofana recovers efficient costs and a reasonable return, while preventing excessive compensation. The return …
Page 17 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
4.8.1.7. Mpofana submitted a COS study detailing a revenue requirement of R80.91 million for FY2026/27. This revenue requirement is …
Page 15 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
-
Decision and Reasons for Decision, Mpofana, FY2026/27
NERSA file 9403
… Eskom Retail Tariff Structural Adjustments (ERTSA). Operational Expenditure 4.8.4. Mpofana’s COS study projects operational expenditure totalling R19.06 million, representing 24 …
Page 16 in our copyOfficial source
National Energy Regulator of South Africa, its decision as published on nersa.org.za
Only official texts are here: Government Gazettes from the Government Printing Works and decisions of the National Energy Regulator (NERSA), which the Copyright Act (s12(8)(a)) leaves free of copyright. Each result names its publisher and links to the official copy. Our copy is the file we read the figures from, fingerprinted (sha256). Reports from the Department of Water and Sanitation aren’t here, as their terms don’t say they may be republished. The pages of NERSA decisions that list objectors and comments (455 pages) are left out, as they name people; in our copies of those decisions each such page is replaced by a page saying it is withheld, and the whole decision is on NERSA’s site. Pages printed as pictures are found only where we read them for a dataset. As data: /api/search/documents?q=.